Just Wrought

Recovering playwright, once won a STRANGER Genius Award for theater. Now writing a bloated novel about… G-d help me! Theatre.

Tag: William Salyers

  • SIFF Lord

    SIFF Lord

    In 1995, the independent feature film I wrote and starred in was accepted to the Seattle International Film Festival. Finally, after ten years struggling in the theatre, I was clearly on my way to a long, satisfying, and integrity-adorned career as a film artist. My movie was fresh, bold and brilliant, as was my acting in it. In the spring of 1995 these notions had the certainty of blue skies in May.

    Of course, it should be noted, this was Seattle, where the certainty of blue skies, in May or otherwise, can prove, well, somewhat illusive.

    I received an invitation to a kick-off party in the SIFF hospitality suite on the twenty-somethingth floor of the downtown Sheraton. I went with my buddy, a then Seattle actor, who now lives and thrives in Hollywood, as so many then Seattle actors do. My buddy had starred in a different indy feature accepted by the festival. I had issues with his film’s script but mostly kept these qualms to myself. I was on the edge of tremendous success, you’ll recall, so I could afford to be beneficent.

    My buddy and I had fun at the kick-off party, even though we didn’t really know anybody else, the others mostly being from outside Seattle and certainly outside the Seattle theatre scene. We ate the free food and drank the free booze and jabbered at each other passionately, all in the prodigious quantities that relatively young actors and playwrights are wont to indulge free food, free booze and passionate jabbering. We laughed louder and louder as we got drunker and drunker. We started getting odd looks. International film folk, as it turns out, are not as boisterous as Seattle show folk. Lesson learned. We started to feel out of place, and then, because it was still early in the evening, started to wonder why we were lingering. We were pleasantly and sufficiently lit to go find some other fun. We wound up at The 211 Pool Hall, then located on 2nd Avenue above the Speakeasy internet café.

    In my memory, the 211 Pool Hall remains one of the most beautiful and inspiring interior spaces I have ever had the privilege to set foot in. This was a pool hall, plain and simple, but its plainness and simplicity evoked something profoundly holy. This was a sanctum. Nowadays most places with pool tables crank loud music. At the 211 there was no music at all. Nothing to hear but the murmur of conversations and the soft clicks of balls colliding, occasionally punctuated by the rifle crack of some shark’s powerhouse break, all echoing off the institutional blue-green walls and double high ceilings. For a poor artist working stiff like me, the 211 was somewhere I could go for two hours of serenity and a pitcher of beer, and still not be more than ten bucks lighter when I left.

    I’m not sure if that night my buddy and I went was the same that Hans Altweis was obliged to wear the “I’m a Whistler” sign. The 211’s “No Whistling” rule was prominently posted and inviolable, along with “No Massé Shots.” Today, those of us lucky enough to know Hans, or at least his work as an incomparably gifted actor, won’t be surprised to learn that he was undaunted by such a silly-seeming rule; but fewer of us are lucky enough to have known the counter-waitress Annie, the 211’s squat but fierce enforcer. Annie was even less daunted by Hans than Hans was by silly rules, and thus it was he came to wear the “I’m a Whistler” sign around his neck for the remainder of his stay in the pool hall that night. To be completely accurate, and fair to Hans, I should note that he wore his cardboard penance with the kind of gracious grin that only a man supremely confident in his charms can display, especially in the face of a starkly righteous moral authority utterly unswayed by such charms.

    But I digress. As I said, I’m not even sure it was that night that Hans joined us. All I know is we had a great time playing good cheap pool, drinking good cheap beer, and when we left I went home to my studio apartment to get some sleep because my director/producer and co-producer were flying into SeaTac the next morning.

    I picked them up and drove them directly to the Sheraton to check into the festival, around eleven a.m. The woman behind the hospitality suite’s greeting desk must have recognized me from the night before because she stood up instinctively and pushed her palm out like a traffic cop, saying, “The bar is closed.” Of course, my colleagues found this deeply hilarious. It was pretty damned funny, come to think of it. The woman, however, never completely lost her look of panic, even as I explained that I was simply there to help my colleagues check in. Another woman joined her and they began to help us through the process. When I gave them my name for my set of festival comps, they hunted through their roster, but found nothing. They looked again. Nothing. I tried to be cool, even helpful. “Well, I must be on some sort of list. I was invited to the kick-off party last night.”

    One of them went back into the bedroom being used as an inner office.  A few moments later she came back with an older guy. A fervid whispering conference simmered among the three SIFF staffers. The guy, a supervisor ostensibly, consulted the roster himself. He asked me my name again. I spelled it. They consulted another list. He looked at me. He said my name, brow furrowed in a effort to remember something.

    I said, “Right. That’s me.”

    And then it dawned for the guy. He turned to his colleagues and said softly but loud enough for everyone in the room to hear: “I think I know what the problem is. He’s just the screenwriter.”

    And there it was, the first shoe dropping through my blue sky dream of an illustrious film career. 

    John Hartl, then critic for The Seattle Times hated everything about my movie except for the soundtrack, which was written by Gordon Gano of The Violent Femmes (and features, on various tracks, the lead vocal contributions of John Kale, Frank Black, Lou Reed, P.J. Harvey, The Might be Giants and the front woman for the 4 Non Blondes.) Hartl made a point of singling out my script for excoriation. “Fatally overwritten” he called it. I took this to mean that if you didn’t leave the cinema at some point during the screening—to get, say, some popcorn, or use the rest room— my screenplay could quite literally kill you. Maybe he meant something different, but I found my interpretation more consoling. I mean, come on! “Fatally overwritten!?” That’s fucking power! My wife likes to assure me that this will be the inscription for my tombstone.

    “Here lies Paul Mullin. Fatally overwritten.”

    (more…)

  • The Bardo of American Poets, Patriot and Expatriate

    The Bardo of American Poets, Patriot and Expatriate

    Yesterday I posted smart-alecky status on Facebook  about April being misunderstood as the cruelest month. In no time, my good friend Michael Doyle chimed in defending the bumbershoot-toting Hollow Man who posited the fourth month’s excessive cruelty. (If you’re not reading Doyle’s blog regularly, here’s why you should be.) The string was quickly unraveling into adjacent subjects, adjacent poets, when Doyle made one of the funnier and more insightful analogies I have ever come across. “Pound is to Eliot what Cheney was to Bush.”

    It made me think of this section from an early draft of An American Book of the Dead* The Game Show†. Why was it cut? Official history blames structural redundancy: it echoed the first act’s “The Bardo of American Heroes of Violence” without advancing the second act’ action significantly. But an alternative legend purports that the bardo was actually blown away because the costume/design concept for the original L. A. production was so painful to watch unfold that the author, egged on by the actor who played Walt Whitman, simply wiped the whole shebang rather than risk having to watch something like it again.

    Still, I’m proud of the “Poet’s Bardo”, and believe it sort of stands on its own as a bizarre bit of poetry geek fan fiction.  (Plus, any time we can see Ezra Pound returned to his rightful gorilla cage, earned with the nastiest bits of bigoted treason, well, that’s a good time by me.)

    (more…)

  • Putting the Fail back in “Experimental”

    Putting the Fail back in “Experimental”

    Artists love to talk about being “experimental”, and it rightfully drives scientists nuts.  We artists obnoxiously brandish that word whenever what we really mean is “avant garde” or “edgy”or “provocative” or “abstruse”.  Any actual scientist understands that true experiments have rules and consequences. Experiments are tests of hypotheses hoping to become theories; and theories, in order to prove useful, must be falsifiable.  In other words, true experiments by definition contain the possibility of failure.  However, all too often in the arts, especially theatre, work gets described as “experimental” that is, in fact, incapable of being “falsified”, because it never had a truthful purpose in the first place. Consequently, the worst kind of “experimental artist” will blame the audience for every failure of meaning or impact.

    I promise I will not be doing that this coming Monday evening at the Bathhouse Theater on Green Lake. Instead, with the help of my truly gifted colleagues Susanna Burney, Amy Love, William Salyers and John Q. Smith I will be performing a bona fide artistic experiment by reading aloud my very latest play Philosophical Zombie Killers.  I attempt things in this script I have never seen tried before in the theatre, and thus the ominous likelihood looms that some of these things I am trying can, and most likely will, fail. 

    I am not asking you to come see my greatest latest triumph, which I happen to have dubbed “experimental” cuz it sounds cool.  I am asking you to come see my latest experiment, and help me make it better, by watching where it fails, and letting me know.

    Saint Denis

    Here are the details:

    The graduate level seminar is about human conscious-ness. Or at least that’s what you thought when you signed up for it. Now someone’s telling you that you’re 45 years old and you’re dying. You certainly didn’t sign up for that. Now this alcoholic professor is asking you to explain consciousness to him. And this depressed ex-cop from Missouri is telling you about the epidemic of decapitations in Seattle. And this weird lady from Omnisoft just wants you to admit that there’s no such thing as consciousness and no such thing as you for that matter. Could she possibly be right? Might make dying easier. Who said you were dying?

    Who:       Susanna Burney, Amy Love, William Salyers and John Q. Smith

    What:     Philosophical Zombie Killers by Paul Mullin

    Where:   The Bathhouse Theater in Green Lake

    When:    October 15, 2012, 7pm

    How:      Pay what-you-will, including nothing at all. You’re doing us a favor by giving it a listen.

    Reserve seats at Brown Paper Tickets: http://www.brownpapertickets.com/event/278468

  • My Friend Goes to LA, Becomes Famous Raccoon, Returns to Seattle to Kill Philosophical Zombies

    My Friend Goes to LA, Becomes Famous Raccoon, Returns to Seattle to Kill Philosophical Zombies

    William Salyers and I met during Seattle’s fervent 90’s: a now hazy golden age when you could beg an actor like Paul Giamatti to be in your play workshop, or witness a writer like Karl Gajdusek premiere his deeply surreal, nearly inaccessible Dr.s F.s in the Terminal Ward twenty years before he would premiere his eminently accessible action series, The Last Resort, on national network television. So Bill Salyers and I already sort of knew each other from the scene when were forced by the exigencies of corporate temping into the close proximity of the licensing department of Northern Life Insurance. The two of us would blunt the boredom when we could by improvising various scenarios. I would open with something like:

    PAUL (best British Colonial Officer voice): Do you remember that time in the Congo when the battalion lost its way and we were forced to eat grubs?

    BILL (way better British Colonial Officer voice): Oh, yes. Sergeant Major Grubbs. Terribly good man. Such a pity.

    No one can match Bill for voices and improv.

    When I began writing my play Tuesday— a piece which I now, in retrospect, recognize as my first post-journeyman work— I could only manage to finish it by assuring myself that Bill would play the main character, Audie McCall. That development process, and culminating first production at AHA! Theatre, began a collaboration that lasted over the following 17 years, with Bill premiering the title role of my Louis Slotin Sonata at Circle X Theatre in LA and then playing it off-Broadway, then playing Walt Whitman among several other rolls in An American Book of the Dead – The Game Show, and then inhabiting the skin of the now real-life head of NIH, Francis Collins, in my play about the race to decode the human genome, The Sequence. And it’s not just my plays that Bill has helped to mid-wife. Having run the math, I am now convinced that William Salyers has participated in the world premieres of more plays than any other person currently on the planet. I am still waiting for someone to prove me wrong.

    While the size of the houses my plays premiere in has stayed, well, let’s say “cozy”, Bill has happily gone on to much wider success as a stage actor. For instance, he’s currently premiering Dan O’Brien’s The Body of An American at Portland Center Stage. Beyond the boards, Bill has achieved exponentially greater fame —the kind only Hollywood can offer— for work he’s done as a voice actor. I finally managed to impress my nephews with my show business connections when I told them that the guy who voiced Rigby the Raccoon on The Regular Show was my good friend. (Congratulations to Bill and everyone on TRS for their freshly won Emmy!)

    All this history is just my a long winded wind-up to telling you that Bill will once again be helping me bring a new play to life by playing the role of Simon in a very raw reading of my latest stab, Philosophical Zombie Killers, along with Susanna Burney, John Q. Smith and Amy Love.

    Here’s a sort of synopsis of the play:

    The graduate level seminar is about human consciousness. Or at least that’s what you thought when you signed up for it. Now someone’s telling you that you’re 45 years old and you’re dying. You certainly didn’t sign up for that. Now this alcoholic professor is asking you to explain consciousness to him. And this depressed ex-cop from Missouri is telling you about the epidemic of decapitations in Seattle. And this weird lady from Omnisoft just wants you to admit that there’s no such thing as consciousness and no such thing as you for that matter. Could she possibly be right? Might make dying easier. Who said you were dying?

    And here are the details:

    Who:       Susanna Burney, Amy Love, William Salyers and John Q. Smith

    What:     Philosophical Zombie Killers by Paul Mullin

    Where:   The Bathhouse Theater in Green Lake

    When:    October 15, 2012, 7pm

    How:      Pay what-you-will, including nothing at all. You’re doing us a favor by giving it a listen.

    Reserve seats at Brown Paper Tickets: http://www.brownpapertickets.com/event/278468

    Zombie Bill

  • Seattle Artists Lose an Unsung Support

    Seattle Artists Lose an Unsung Support

    When I first came to Seattle in 1990 I had only one decent paying trade to my name: I knew how to clean glass. The problem was I was spoiled. In New York I had worked mostly high-rise residential units and got paid three dollars a window by my boss/friend Patrick Shields who worked next to me and also happened to be an actor/writer himself. In Seattle the only window work I could find was with a large outfit that did commercial properties and offered a flat ten dollars an hour. Instead of a bon vivant, polymath, small business-owner working next to me, I had ex-cons, two-bit bigots and pot-smoking thugs tying my ropes. (Literally.  One guy told me getting high beforehand made him concentrate harder on the knots.) I quit after a week and took a job dishing at a breakfast cafe in Green Lake, but the money from that, barely above minimum wage, just wasn’t enough.

    The advice I got at the 1911, the dive-bar de facto headquarters of 90’s Seattle fringe theatre, situated directly across Fourth Avenue from Annex Theatre, was simple: “go to Woods.” Woods and Associates was a small, locally owned temporary and permanent placement service located in the Galland Building downtown. I protested that I had zero office experience. The advice was reiterated: “Go to Woods. They’ll take care of you.  You can even tell them you’re an actor. They like actors.”

    “They like actors!?”  What kind of outfit was this?

    An outfit, as it turns out, that I would have an ongoing professional relationship with for the next two decades. My fellow Annexers were right.  After my initial interview I was paraded around the office to meet owner Sarah Woods, Sarah’s brother Will, Sarah’s business partner Sam Hunter, plus all the rest of the folks in the placement bullpen.  It didn’t matter that I was an actor or that I had never worked in an office.  I would start out slow and simple, they told me.  First gig: the microfilm department of Northern Life Insurance, where I captured images of old annuities documents on their way to the shredder. To tame the boredom I listened to Rush Limbaugh and KPLU jazz on my Sony Walkman. Aldrich Allen, another Annexer, now dead, worked beside me.  A few years later, when I came back from shooting a movie in Maryland to find my first marriage disintegrating, I needed a job desperately. So Woods put me back at “No Life”, this time in the licensing department. It’s where I got to know William Salyers and began to hatch my plan to write a role that only an actor of his talents could pull off.  A few years later we premiered Tuesday at AHA! Theatre.

    As time went on, I even found myself temping  in the Woods office itself. I called these gigs “meta-temping”. I used to love Fridays, not only because Sarah ordered in lunch and a masseuse every week, but also because Woods, unlike any other temp service I knew, paid every week,  on the week.  Many temps came into to pick up their checks personally, giving me a chance to do a quick gossip swap with my fellow show folk, like Chris Jeffries or Josh List.

    It is not an exaggeration to say Woods was a big part of why my wife and I came back to Seattle from New York City after 9/11.  Temp work in Manhattan had completely dried up.  My unemployment was running out and I had literally no idea how I was going to support our new-born baby boy.  I was certain, however, that if we went back to Seattle, Woods would find work for either Heather or me, so that the other could stay home with the baby.  As it turned out, Heather landed the more lucrative gig—she always could stand working for lawyers more than me.  On nice days I would roll my son in his stroller downtown from Capitol Hill and often visit the folks at Woods after having lunch with Heather.  Bottom line:  after a very tough year, Woods gave us options in another city where theatre thrived.

    Woods and Associates will be closing their offices for good today.  When I spoke with Sarah yesterday she sounded upbeat: “I don’t regret the decision at all, but it I’m the one making it so I understand it’s hard for others.”  I nearly choked up when I told her what Woods had meant to me and my family over the years.  “That’s the sad part,” she replied.  “We’ve all been there for each other: the folks that work for us, the client companies.”  Certainly Woods has always been there for me.  No matter how bad a particular day gig might get, I could always think to myself, “Well, I can quit and Woods’ll take care of me: find me something.”  Now, I guess I’m on my own.  My only solace is that I’m not alone in feeling that way.

    * * *

    So here’s my request.  If you are an artist, theatre or otherwise, and Woods has helped you at some point, please chime in down in the comments section below.  Share a story if you’d like, but chime in, regardless, even with just your name.  I’d love to share a sense of how many creative folks Woods and Associates has helped over the years.

  • Lost and Found

    Lost and Found

    Circle X Theatre’s world premiere of An American Book of the Dead – The Game Show, designed by Gary Smoot, was the most visually evocative production of any show I have ever written.   The tableaus and scenic effects were so unique and so profoundly stunning that it’s damned near impossible to describe them in words.  So imagine how depressing it has been these nine years to think that the only two surviving images of the show were this…

    And this…

    Kevin Fabian as Blink and the spokesmodels (Jamie Bullock & Daniele O'Loughlin) from the Circle X Theatre World Premiere of An American Book of the Dead- The Game Show.

    Now don’t get me wrong: the incomparable Kellie Waymire ravishes us posing above as the troubled proto-supermodel Jacqui Potts*; and Blink Bodie (Kevin Fabian) flanked by his spokesmodels (Jamie Bullock & Daniele O’Laughlin) wrapped in Old Glory certainly hits the “American” part of the title on the nose.  On the other hand, not only do both shots fail to tell us anything novel about the show, they also, more importantly, don’t tell us what we don’t know about it, thus piquing our curiousity enough to maybe come see.  Compare them with this newly unearthed shot, again of Kellie as Jacqui…

    Kellie Waymire as Jacqui Potts in the all together.

    This not only screams “sex”, but “mystery”, “exposure”, and somehow, oddly, “death” itself.  If we had captioned this “Jacqui Potts about to enter the bardo realm by dropping acid and posing nude for the first time”, we might just have been able to get your butt in one of Circle X’s seats, mightn’t we?   Why we did not try to sell the show with the countless more evocative images than those first two, I will probably never know.  The fact is, however, that because those two shots were used for publicity, they alone survived.  Or so I thought for nearly a decade.

    A lot of life got lived between 2002 and now†, and the rolls of film that all of us knew were captured in that meticulous marathon photo call somehow disappeared  somewhere along the way.  I confirmed the loss when I started blogging here at Just Wrought and wanted to write about how I love to work with designers as early as possible in the development process.  Even though I was living in New York City when I wrote ABOD and Gary Smoot lived in Los Angeles, we somehow managed to meet in Seattle over a long post-9/11 Thanksgiving weekend, and in the living room of Gary’s boss’s house we brainstormed ways to stage the bizarre effects I was imagining.

    I described the process in my essay on designers:

    We needed three isolation booths for the afterlife contestants.  I wanted something straightforward and on the nose, similar to the glass boxes they used in Twenty-One.  Naturally, Gary zagged off my zig.  We went through a lot of ideas, including bubble packs for life-sized action heroes, file cabinets and morgue drawers.  Finally he landed on simple genius, and of course had the skill and the luck to bring it together:  three identical, perfectly white refrigerators, with plastic magnet letters to spell out each enclosed contestant’s name. When the intense gelled Fresnels were focused on them, the white surface utterly transformed into whatever deeply saturated color the lighting designer chose to call up.  The “contestents” blithely climbed in and out of them, emerging unexpectedly from one after entering another, like so many peas in a karmic shell game.  For the audience the layers of meaning dawned almost imperceptibly but no less forcefully for that: the three fridges were uniquely American icons of consumption, comfort, death and banality all at once, and as they were signifying these things, it was also obvious that they were nothing more or less than refrigerators, or isolation booths, or maybe some vast gentle joke played on everyone from patron to playwright.  When Gary’s designing the sense of play never leaves the play, even if the play involves death at its very core.

    When I wrote that I had no reason to believe anyone would ever again be able to see what I was trying to describe.  When I called Gary to ask if he had captured any photos for his own records, he said he might have, but that he would have to dig for them when he had some free time.  That’s Smoot code for, “It ain’t gonna happen.”  Gary never has free time.  Even so, a few months later he told me he had looked and hadn’t find anything.  Now we were both bummed.

    Then, a few months later, I was on the phone with Tim Wright, the current Artistic Director of Circle X, pitching him a new script when a mini-miracle occurred.  Tim casually mentioned that he had the ABOD production shot negatives and if I wanted, he would send them to me!  The rest was logistics.  This past week I got the negs developed to digital at a respectable mom and pop photo shop, and spent most of Saturday uploading the images to Flickr and Face Book and tagging them with the names of old friends.*†    I smiled all day as folks involved with the production chimed in to say hello, share memories,tag more photos and grab shots for the profile pics.

    So you wanna see those fridges, and how well they worked?  Well, in lieu of a few thousand words, here’s a few pictures…

     Barry goes into the isolation booth Tommy Hennessy mourns  Surge gets a Karma inversion Tanya squares off with Surge

     The Rat Pack in the Bardo of Louie Prima 4

    *Deep inside information:  It is a testament to Kellie’s wide-spectrum of talent and tireless dedication that she also helped to sew and hang the sumptuous red curtain behind her in this shot.

    †Not to mention death: Kellie Waymire died in 2003.

    *†You can enjoy the full set on Flickr, here… 

    Available Now
    image
    imageBuy Now
  • The Macallan Talks – Side Two

    The Macallan Talks – Side Two

    A few days ago I shared a transcript I recently found from the first half of a cassette tape recording that William Salyers and I made one evening in 1997 while consuming a bottle of Macallan scotch, each.  As promised, I share the second half of the full transcript at the end of this post.

    We are clearly getting drunker on side two.  Alas, this does not increase the insightfulness of our comments.  Just the opposite, I’m afraid.  I sure don’t like myself very much as the discussion wears on.  It feels to me, thirteen years later, like I am trying to badger Bill into believing he will be a better artist once he admits he’s an artist and opens himself up to– what?—the “wider universe”; the “heroism of art”, or whatever woo-woo crap 30-year old-Paul was spouting.  At one point, I literally say to him: “I think you need to start reading folktales.”  Can you even get more excruciatingly Left-Coast Joseph Campbellish condescending than that? 

    In the intervening time since I gave him this advice Bill Salyers has gone on to world premiere the title role in Louis Slotin Sonata  in Los Angeles and then off-Broadway, winning himself several awards and enormous critical acclaim for his efforts.  He also world-premiered my play An American Book Of The Dead – The Game Show, directed the world premiere of The Good Ship Manhattan, world premiered The Sequence playing future Nobel Laureate, Francis Collins, and these are just the examples from my scripts. The quality of his work as an actor in an even broader panoply of plays —classic, modern or brand new (mine and others) — is legend.  And I think it is safe to say that Bill never really changed his point of view from the one he espouses in these recordings.  In other words, for all my high holy exhortation to become a better artist by first admitting he is one, Bill remained a great artist, and became an even greater one, simply by being Bill.  Lesson learned: not all heroes and artists want to be heroes and artists— some don’t even believe in such things— and yet, somehow, art and heroism still happen.

    So, with that, here’s some highlights, then the whole thing at the end if you’re interested:

    Blowing smoke up Salyers’ shorts while simultaneously patronizing him

    PAUL:  I consider you to be as great an artist as I’ve ever met.  I consider you… to…I consider that I need to learn things about my craft that you’ve already learned about yours.  I’ve also– yeah!  And I’m starting to, because you’ve worked at your craft.  You’ve been pragmatic hands-on with your craft in a lot of different ways that I’m just starting to: I’m starting to write for television, you know.  I’m starting to… write for hire.

    BILL:  Right.

    PAUL:  You know?

    BILL:  Right.

    PAUL:  Which you’ve been doing for a while.  In fact, in some ways, you… that’s what you do is act for hire…. Except on projects like TUESDAY where you chose to do it because of– of whatever feelings you have for the work.  Um… but I– but I think the one thing that I’ve always kind of instinctively known, whether it was because of my religions upbringing, or because of my attraction to art.

    BILL:  Mm-hm

    PAUL:  Because my attraction to art was one of a knight in shining armor.  And we can talk about that too.  Uh…I have revised my vision– but not completely on that.  Um… I do think that artists are true heroes.

    BILL:  Hmm?  (Maybe this is sort of a verbal shrug?)

    PAUL:  True heroes.  That true artists are those people who um…. and I include that person who can make the exquisite phad tai, or… or the exquisite scotch, or, or can uh… well, we can talk about that maybe later, but– I feel like one of the things that– that you refuse to admit is that that which you do is beyond your control–

    BILL:  Mmm-hmm.

    PAUL:  To a certain extent.  And you’re uncomfortable with that.

    Devolving into faux-Jesse Jacksonism

    PAUL:  For many people– for the born-again Christians of the world– I would nothing but heartily convince them that there is nothing outside themselves.

    (Bill laughs.)

    PAUL:  That that world which they have created is their own fucking fucked-up… vision of the world.

    BILL:  Yeah.

    PAUL:  And that that which they hate is themselves.  And that which they love is a… sweetened aspect of themselves and that they have not left themselves.

    BILL:  Right.

    PAUL:  You… you I would encourage you to see the other aspect of the universe, and that is that you are constantly connected in a thousand million different ways to that which you feel unconnected to.  And that that the– that the satellite– you’re either a satellite revolving around the sun or you are the revolution.  You know?

    BILL:  Mmm.

    PAUL:  You know?

    BILL:  Mmm-hmm.

    PAUL:  And uh… not to sound like Jesse Jackson.   Although that would be– Fuck, man.  I should write for Jesse Jackson ‘cuz that’s great!

    (Bill laughs.)

    PAUL:  That’s better than anything Jesse’s said in a long mother-fucking time. 

    (Bill laughs.)

    PAUL:  You’re either that which revolves around the sun, or (Jesse Voice) you are the revolution!

    BILL:  You’re right.  That does sound like Jesse.

    PAUL:  Umm.  Except it doesn’t rhyme.  But it’s– it’s a little too sublime for Jesse.  We’ll have to find some other demagogue for it.  But– although I love– my heart goes out to Jesse.  I can’t hate, Jesse.  He’s fab–  Did you hear his speech the last convention?  It rocked.

    Mullin lays an Irish curse on Salyers

    PAUL:  There’s– There’s this great Zen koan that I love.  Says– the young monk comes to the master, and says, you know, “I’m meditating but I’m too cold.”  And the Zen master says, “Well, you know when cold go to that place where you are so cold that it kills you and when you are hot go to that place where you are so hot that it kills you.”  And I lay this Irish curse on you: “Live in that universe where there is no art.  Be that universe where there is no art.”

    BILL:  Well, I think I’ve tried to.  I mean, I–

    PAUL:  No, I mean it.

    (Paul laughs.)

    PAUL:  NO, I MEAN IT!

    (Paul laughs hysterically.)

    BILL (drunken voice mockery of Paul):  You don’t understand!

    On whether an actor should ever argue a director down

    BILL:  This stuff about– this stuff about uh– nobody stops to think about the fact that there was a director involved in that show.  It wasn’t just about what Steven wrote.  It wasn’t just about what I did, you know?  What I– when I’m– when I’m rending my hair, my fake hair, at an incredible point and I go, “RENFIELD!”  That’s not necessarily my choice.

    PAUL:  Right.

    BILL:  That’s me doing what I was told the best way I could.  And I’m–

    PAUL:  Right.

    BILL:  And I’m presented with the challenge of trying to find truth in that.  Now a lot of actors would have argued Eddie down….  That’s not my job.  It’s not my– it’s not my job to uh– promote myself–

    PAUL:  Is there ever a time when it’s right to argue a director down?

    BILL:  Yeah, when you’re the other director. 

    (Paul begins to groan very lowly. )

    BILL:  If you’re an actor your job is to do what you’re told as best as you possibly can.

    PAUL:  Wow!  Okay!  We come to the truth of it.

    BILL:  I’ve– I’ve long said that.  If you want to direct a play go fucking direct a play.

    PAUL:  Well, wait a second.  Wa-wa-wa-waaaiiit a second

    BILL:  Okay.

    PAUL:  Because I think it’s not as facile as that.

    BILL:  I think it should be.  I think if you’re a craftsman it is.

    PAUL:  Ah well.

    BILL:  –And that’s why I’m not an artist.

    PAUL:  Hmmm.

    BILL:  I– I don’t have any patience for that crap.  I mean, it’s another– it’s another– it’s another way that the film world has invaded what we do.

    PAUL (overlapping):  Well, here we go.  Well, here we go is what I’m saying is like, yes, as the novice, rookie, bullshit actor who’s got a little taste of Stanislavsky, a bad taste via Mr. Uh– Strasberg.

    BILL:  Strasberg, yeah.

    PAUL:  Uh….  That’s the last thing they need to be doing is telling the director what their choices are.  But let me tell you something about Mr. (slurry) Mr. Eddie Levi Lee, is that you know more about theatre in your fucking, you know, nose–

    BILL:  Then I, then I–

    PAUL:  Hair clippings than Eddie Levi Lee knows.

    BILL:  Okay, then if I– if I believe that going into it, I’m a hypocrite when I sign the contract.  And I’m not a hypocrite… so I sign the contract.

    PAUL:  I–  augh!

    On whether an actor should ever refuse a line change from a director

    PAUL:  Billy, you’re saying– you’re saying to me that in no circumstances would it be right for you as one of the best actors that I know uh… to– to call bullshit on a director.  That

    BILL:  I’m saying it’s not my job.

    PAUL (overlapping):  That fucking frightens me.  No, it is your fucking job!

    BILL:  No, it’s not.

    PAUL:  Yes, it is your fucking jo–

    BILL:  I don’t agree with you.

    PAUL (overlapping):  I went to– John Sylvain came to me and said– I had a line that said, “I threw that pass–”  now obviously this is an actor/playwright, a whole ‘nother issue.

    BILL:  I know the line you’re talking about, too.

    PAUL:  Yeah, said, “That fucking nigger dropped it.”

    BILL (simultaneously):  “That fucking nigger dropped it.”

    PAUL:  And Johnny said, “You need to cut that.”  And I said, “You need to go fuck yourself, because one, it’s the night before opening, and two, it’s the fucking script, and THREE, it’s the way we rehearsed it.

    BILL:  Well, let me– let me tell you something.  I’m not saying– don’t misunderstand me.  In that same situation I would have asked John to keep the line.  I wouldn’t have told John to go fuck himself, because John’s the director.

    PAUL:  No!  No!  No!.  But see that’s where I digress with you, because John’s fucking with my shit there and he has no business doing it.

    BILL:  Brother, it’s not–

    PAUL:  And he deserves–

    BILL:  It isn’t your shit!

    PAUL:  Yes!

    BILL:  It’s our shit.

    To follow is the full transcript of the second side of the cassette.

    (more…)

  • The Macallan Talks – Side One

    The Macallan Talks – Side One

    Giving my demons the year off  has left me time to take care of some housecleaning, like backing up my old files to the cloud before my next hard drive crashes.  About a week ago I ran across a couple of old Word files that I thought were lost forever: transcripts from something called “the Macallan Talks”.  The premise was simple: two full fifths of Macallan 12-year-old scotch, a cassette tape recorder, William Salyers and myself.  We would talk about what we always talked about, but capture it on tape finally so that I could transcribe it and then possibly either publish or stage it.  Or at least that’s what I recall the plan was.  This was over thirteen years ago, so I’m not really sure what I was thinking.  All I know is that this conversation has never seen the light of day until now.

    Mostly you get an ardent exchange between two friends who love talking, especially to each other.  Bill and I still blather like this, whether on the phone, since we no longer live in the city, or into the wee hours over scotch and illicit cigarettes, on the now ever rarer occasions when we do manage to get together in person.  What strikes me most clearly now looking over these transcripts is how little our positions have changed in the intervening years. Bill still ardently defends his “craft” against any woo-woo incursions of higher powers or purposes.  I still maintain that what we do, when we do it well, matters in sublime and fundamental ways we can only barely glimpse in fleeting, incomplete flashes.

    Had I made these discussions public at the time, I am convinced that they would have been dismissed as the pompous rantings of a pair of third-tier theatre artists who thought way too highly of themselves and each other.  Now?  Well, nothing’s changed.  All of that is essentially still true (sorry Bill, at least you have a television career), but somehow I imagine (hope?) that the intervening near decade and a half gives our arguments some resonance beyond the moment.  Of course, the final analysis is up to you.  I publish the full first cassette side transcript at the end of this post.  I will publish the second side in another upcoming post.  In the meantime, some highlights from the first half:

    On lying and acting . . .

    (I try to start the tape without Bill knowing but he can tell something’s different about my face.  I’m a horrible liar…. )

    PAUL:   So let’s talk about lying.  Is a good actor a liar or not a liar.

    BILL:  Well you know what Plato thought about that?

    PAUL:  What?

    BILL:  He literally thought–

    PAUL:  Micky Mouse’s dog?

        (beat)

    BILL:  I was about to imitate him and then I realized I couldn’t. 

        (He laughs.)

        ‘Cause he doesn’t–

    BILL & PAUL (together):  Say anything!

    . . . .

    BILL:  From what I remember reading in college, Plato said that actors should be killed because they lie.

    PAUL:  See I consider myself a pretty good actor and I cannot lie to save my life.

    BILL:  Well, I can lie but I consider them to be two separate things.  I don’t… I don’t lie unless I absolutely have to, and I hold that to a pretty high standard.  It’s not about my convenience.  I’ll take a lot of shit before I’ll tell a lie.  Because of that thing we were talking about.  About how it’s an allowance.  How responsibility comes with the power.

    PAUL:  Right.

    BILL:  And the only way I can tell a lie is to buy into myself.

    PAUL:  Yeah, so you involve yourself in the Dark magic.

    On art versus craft . . .

    BILL:  . . . I think the word “art” is pretty useless.  It is so subjective as to be pointless–

    PAUL:  Like “love” or something like that?

    BILL:  Exactly.

    PAUL:  Well, what would you replace it with?  Or would you?

    BILL:  I’m not sure that you need the word.  It’s almost used to describe that which people don’t have the capacity to describe another way.  When someone says “art” they’re either collectors talking about something that’s worth a lot of money, or they are people who are moved beyond the ability to express… that.

    PAUL:  What about when somebody says, “The way that guy does phad thai is a frickin’ art?”

    BILL:  he’s talking about a transcendent experience     that goes beyond what he understands as being the execution of… the act.

    PAUL:  Well, what about that?  Is there something to that?  I mean this “transcendent experience”– if we don’t have a name for it beyond “art” shall we not call it that?

    BILL:  I think it’s the height of craft.  When I approach a role there are a whole lot of givens.  I think particularly in acting, and particular among young actors, there’s a need to over romanticize what we do.

    PAUL:  Well, yeah… and then you get into that nastiness of Method and that whole “I-must-go-through-that-which-my-character-has-go-through” nonsense.

    BILL:  Yes.  That’s right.  And actors saying things like– in all seriousness– “I don’t like to like to take about the craft ’cause I don’t like to over analyze it.  And if I over analyze it, I’ll kill it.”

    PAUL:  Which– yeah– sounds like somebody who…

    BILL:  Doesn’t know what the fuck they’re doing.  that’s exactly right.

    On going the dangers and responsibilities of playing a dark role

    PAUL:  … Ok, I’m gonna go on the record about TUESDAY.  I think that the reason why TUESDAY was hard was because you had met the wall with your “craft”, and with TUESDAY you had to be an artist.  And you were an artist, but it hurt because you were entering a realm where– to use those fantastic mytho-terms– you entered the realm where you were naked and raw.  It’s like the total hero’s journey.  At the beginning we see the hero and he’s kick-ass, but he finally meets the challenge that is capable of kicking his ass.  And then it becomes interesting.  That’s where the heart becomes involved.  And that’s why I argue this art-versus-craft argument over and over again.  And that’s why I’d like to try and get to the meat of it.

    BILL:  So you’re a masochist, because art has to hurt.

    PAUL:  No…   No…  It’s an old Buddhist thing.  You see Westerners misunderstand Buddhism because they think it’s nihilism.  Because they say, “Well what a Zen Buddhist does is he sits in a room for eight hours, and that’s torture!”

    BILL:  Mmm-hmm.

    PAUL:  And it is torture, and I do kinda share the opinion that the people that are attracted to Zen are masochists, but I do it, and I’ve sat in a room for 8 hours and I’ll probably do it again.  See the problem is most Westerners misinterpret Buddhism as saying “You must suffer.”  And I would interpret it slightly differently.  I would say true Buddhism is: “You will suffer.”  But ultimately the suffering is as unimportant, if not more unimportant than the pleasure.

    BILL:  So you don’t glorify the suffering.

    PAUL:  No.  Not all.  The suffering is a message.  And there’s something to be said for computer metaphors– the suffering is like an error message, saying, “Ok, error in sector B.  You’re suffering.  Why?  Why are you hurting?”  Like, why does it hurt to do TUESDAY?…  And you’re looking for reasons like your technique wasn’t quite right,  and I’m saying no.  You’re doing everything right.  You just refuse to admit that that which you are doing is more important than you think it is.  And that that which you are doing is more connected and more vital and more rooted in who you are than you feel comfortable with as a craftsman.

    BILL:  Well my reaction to that is first of all is that… if we go that way for a moment, if we accept that as a truism, I have absolutely no problem in saying I’m not interested in that.  I’m not interested in self-flagellation in public.  That has no–

    PAUL:  Well, first off that’s not what I’m talking about.  And second off, if you were to say that to a Zen master, he’d probably give you a whack on the head, but then he’d say, “Who cares what you’re interested in?”  No one cares what you’re interested in.

    BILL:  But remember I act for selfish reasons.

    PAUL:  Well, maybe it’s time to wake up. . . .

    To follow is the full transcript of the first side of the cassette. 

    (more…)

  • The Poem that Started All This*

    The Poem that Started All This*

    Simple Sympathy

    Bill calls because you’re still
    angry, not at him, but everything.
    Bill wouldn’t call if you were just angry at him.

    So, instead of walking to the water’s edge to sit
    zazen on the spot on the bench someone carved PAUL
    into years before you appeared with your dumb ritual

    — bowing once before it, turning, bowing again to the sound,
    then sitting, bowing again and then just sitting
    maybe fifteen, eighteen minutes in all weather–

    you rant over the wind’s blow into the cell phone and Bill,
    like a patient boxing coach with sparring mitts gives
    you just enough flat punchback to keep you  swinging, bleeding

    off just enough of your blockheaded hate
    for feckless actors and administrators in a rag doll
    death dying theatre and mostly your own damned self

    for writing another damned play to put on a shelf
    over and over putting yourself here,
    in front of these waves strangely 


    luminous, ominous, heaving the sound
    in sympathy,  or so it seems,
    to your simple mind.

    Said spot where I sit zazen. 

     *The create date on the Word file containing this poem is Monday, October 26, 2009, exactly a year ago today.  Obviously, I was stuck in a very frustrated place.  I had just learned that the theatre in Southern California that seemed so eager to premiere my farce Gossamer Grudges had suddenly, unaccountably and irrevocably lost interest. We at NewsWrights United were also starting to realize that a certain “nice” leader within Seattle’s regional theatre echelons was not, in fact, going to come through on his glad-handing promises of resources and good will for the first edition of our Living Newspaper, It’s Not in the P-I.  I was feeling fucked, frankly, and very deeply sorry for myself. 

    Anger has always been a part of my life.  Twenty years of Zen practice has not changed that and I doubt the remainder of a lifetime will.  Anger is part of who I am.  On the other hand, anger is not always inappropriate.  Certainly when it comes to Seattle’s current theatre situation, the old hippy adage applies: “If you’re not outraged you’re not paying attention.”  And, of course, anger unshared is absolutely no fun at all.

    I didn’t know it then, but within a few weeks of howling out this poem, I would begin planning the essays that I started posting here last December.  I suspect Bill Salyers is glad that I now have this place to vent.  For my part, I am grateful too to have Just Wrought, but much so much more grateful that I have my Zen practice, friends like Bill, and the wide open daunting weather of the Puget Sound in autumn, vast enough to humble any marginally sane human being.

    Full disclosure:  I reworked the poem a bit since I first posted it on Face Book a year ago.

  • Another Sample of MSK’s Insight on her Award Day

    Another Sample of MSK’s Insight on her Award Day

    Every truly great actor whom I know personally possesses something that all of the just-almost-great actors whom I personally know utterly lack.  (I must tread carefully now.)  Actors like Marya Sea Kaminski and William Salyers, with whom I inevitably compare her, nurse a kernel of contempt for the charms of their craft.  Or is it contempt?  Disdain? Skepticism may be kinder, if not more accurate.  They quietly eschew that most of loathsome habit of actors, self-back-patting.

    SELF-BACK-PATTING ACTOR: “How many people do you know who can do what I do on stage?”

    EVERYONE ELSE: “Well… not many, but perhaps that’s a blessing?

    Great actors do not celebrate themselves.  Great actors, perhaps to a fault, don’t celebrate much at all in the theatre (unless, of course, the character they are playing is celebrating).  They are almost always too busy, too focused, keeping their heads down and digging deeper.   They understand that the show is not them, but that, counter-intuitively, they are in fact the show.  And thus people keep coming back to see them, or not them, per se, but them breathing, them giggling, them preening prancing prattling, sloppily kissing, them dying and killing, them living.  Or put another way, them [anything but acting].

    One of the reasons Marya is such a pleasure to work with is that she quietly leans her brain more deeply into the art than most of her colleagues.  Evidence, is it, you need?  This from her current Stranger feature explaining why she was given this year’s Genius Award for Theatre.

    …that’s the fear that people have been talking about with the Method since the beginning,” she says. “I can think about my dog getting hit and get teary—until the day thinking about my dog getting hit doesn’t get me teary anymore. And then I’ve failed in two ways: I’ve failed to bring an honest emotion to the stage and I’ve numbed myself to that personal experience.”

    Simply. . .

    Briliant.

    That’s Marya.