Just Wrought

Recovering playwright, once won a STRANGER Genius Award for theater. Now writing a bloated novel about… G-d help me! Theatre.

Tag: The God of Carnage

  • How Theatre Really Could Save the World

    How Theatre Really Could Save the World

    I am reading Jaron Lanier’s simultaneously depressing and invigorating manifesto, You are Not a Gadget and I plan to write a full review of it soon, since it touches on so much of what we are doing over at NewsWrights United, but when I ran across this section I felt compelled to rush to share an excerpt (while noting the irony that rushing and excerpting are two of then things Lanier warns we do far too much of in the digital age).

    It is easy to forget that the very idea of a digital expression involves a trade-off of metaphysical overtones…. 

    A digital image of an oil painting is forever a representation, not a real thing.  A real painting is a bottomless mystery, like any other real thing.  An oil painting changes with time; cracks appear on its face.  It has texture, odor, and a sense of presence and history. 

    … You could define a … standard for representing oil paintings that includes odors, cracks, and so on, but it will always turn out that you forgot something, like the weight or the tautness of the canvas. 

    The definition of a digital object is based on assumptions of what aspects of it will turn out to be important.…  If you didn’t specify the weight of a digital painting in the original definition, it isn’t just weightless, it is less than weightless.

    A physical object, on the other hand, will be fully rich and fully real whatever you do to it.  It will respond to any experiment a scientist can conceive.  What makes something fully real is that it is impossible to represent to completion.

    A digital image, or any other kind of digital fragment, is a useful compromise.  It captures a certain limited measurement of reality within a standardized system that removes any of the original source’s unique qualities.  No digital image is really distinct from any other; they can be morphed and mashed up.”

    Theatre by definition takes place in the real world.  As I wrote in an early draft of my play The Ten Thousand Things: “Theatre has limits.  Limits of distance, scale.  If I can’t reach you with my own live voice, it’s not really theatre anymore.” This drawback, which we have bemoaned since the advent of microphones, turns out to actually be an asset.  Theatre cannot be represented.  It can only be presented.

    So why are we still so stuck in representational theatre: literal living room “dramas” that represent so-called “real-life”  in so called “real-time?”  Would our standards as theatre artists be higher if we accepted the truth that our art form may stand squarely on the front line of the battle to keep culture human?  Would we hold our feet closer to the fire of true creation and not just continue to spew out fodder for, by and about an ever dwindling Upper Upper Middle Class?

    We theatre artists have to stop thinking we have been left behind in some technology backwater of the struggle for expression, and instead wade into the fray confident that our magic is more powerful than anything Silicon Valley can produce.  Our magic is real.  It is bottomless.  The present of theatre can only be presented.  It can never be re-gifted.

    Hey.

    Welcome to the fray.

  • Frasier Takes the Stage

    Frasier Takes the Stage

    Those of us who lived in Seattle back when the sitcom Frasier was still on the air used to get a kick out of the shows many geographical gaffes.  We would laugh, shaking our heads when some character arranged a meeting at a diner on 14th street because we knew that not only was there no such restaurant in Seattle, there was no such street.  The film Sleepless in Seattle offers similar hilarities.  Characters casually stroll from Pike Place Market to Gas Works Park, and in one scene a dreamy distracted Tom Hanks paddles his son in a canoe from Portage Bay to Alki Beach: not an impossible feat, but nearly so seeing as the trip would be some twelve and a half miles by water, one-way, and require the canoe to pass through the Ballard Locks and major ferry lanes.  He should have at least worked up a sweat during the four or five hours it would have taken him.

    Frasier’s apartment has a lot in common with the apartment in The God of Carnage, which opened last night at the Seattle Rep.  It’s beautiful, meticulously appointed to indicate tasteful wealth, and it simply does not exist– because it could not exist– in Seattle.  As a private residence window cleaner in Manhattan for three years, I have seen plenty of apartments like the one I saw last night on the Rep’s stage.  A few in SoHo, a couple in the Village, but really nearly almost all of them on the Upper West Side.  As a resident of Seattle, on and off, for seventeen years I have never once seen such an apartment here, and certainly not occupied by an upper middle class couple with two young children.  The very notion is absurd.  (And not the good Ionesco kind.)

    The play proffers “Meydenbauer Park” and “the 405” and “Tukwilla” as obvious and, frankly, clunky substitutions for the actual places meant before the play’s rapid import from Broadway, namely Central Park, the FDR Highway and Long Island.  Why do I care?  Well if it were a Frasier episode on the television I wouldn’t, but this was yet another play for, by and about Upper West Siders forced down the guffawing gullets of Big House theatre goers who in reality live 2,700 miles and tens of thousands of dollars of annual salary away from the action of this play.

    Some aspects of parenthood are universal.  Of course.  But in a play like Carnage the devil is in the details, those aspects which are deeply specific to the city where one lives with one’s family: the tiny hopes and niggling fears for your children, the snobberies and slights, the lines of attack and defense.  My wife and I moved back to Seattle from New York City shortly after our first son was born precisely because we understood these deep existential differences between raising kids there compared to raising them here.  I think every parent in that audience last night shares a similar understanding, and implicitly understood further that the play they were seeing, as funny as it was—funny as Frasier frankly– had very little to do with their actual lives.

    So here’s a crazy thought, if you are going to take the trouble to substitute out words so that you can pretend a play takes place in Seattle, why not go a few steps further and substitute all of the words.   Have it written such that the story clearly lives here, thus giving your audience the genuine and irreplaceable thrill of seeing their actual experiences staged instead of those of some Upper Class Upper West-Siders.  And if you’re going to do that, then here’s an even crazier thought: have someone who lives here wright it.